download
this article
The lineaments
of a new intellectual and practical discipline is brewing that,
as yet, cannot be found in any university or college course. Lurking
in this fementing pot of human-to-human relations is, as one devotee
put it,
‘what every newly elected politician needs training in before
taking office."
Competence
n. (also competency): being competent, ability
Thirty years of ICA
research and training have generated a band of facilitator-consultants
around the world who are second to none in their grasp and practice
of the dynamics and "how-to’s" of the art and science
of group facilitation. In many nations round the world, these practitioners
have laboured for years facilitating community consultations in the
developing nations, assisting major corporations and other organizations
to work cooperatively to solve problems, and then trained others in
the same art and science.
These graduates of
ICA training have now teamed up with representatives from other traditions
of consultation to create a bold new organization, The International
Association of Facilitators (IAF). Among other items on the IAF’s
agenda is a statement on the specific Competences involved in participative
facilitation. So far, members have listed Competences gleaned from
their own training and experience, facilitator groups in different
locations have forged out their own skill listings, and all these have
been amalgamated with the ability charts of other facilitation traditions.
The end product will be a statement of the multifarious abilities needed
by a facilitator. This will give both ICA and the IAF a platform from
which to evaluate where trainee facilitators are on the journey toward
facilitation mastery. A big picture is beginning to emerge from this
mass of data that is far more than a dry list of what facilitators
have "gotta be able to do." What is actually lurking in the
preliminary gestalt is a prescription for creating a culture of participation,
the lineaments of an emerging new discipline, a paradigm for human-to
human relations, and, possibly, as one devotee put it, "what every
newly elected politician needs training in before taking office."
The
Facilitator Is Effective in Using the Core Methods
The facilitator is
competent in designing and leading larger or smaller group processes
and events: a conversation or discussion, a meeting, a workshop, a
design conference, an environmental review, a strategic planning session
or a macro program of consultation. With this comes a complete familiarity
with the process of creating and sequencing questions that move the
group from surface considerations into the depth implications of any
topic. Underneath this again is the capacity to distinguish process
from content, and the discernment to decide which bracket of methods
best fits the client’s needs. Beyond simply knowing the steps
of the methods, the facilitator has a profound comprehension of the
underlying framework of facilitation through which the difference between
mere technique and underlying method is made obvious. As a result,
the facilitator is free to flex in the face of new emerging possibilities
The
Facilitator Carefully Manages the Client Relationship and Prepares
Thoroughly
The facilitator has
to be able to care in depth for the client organization. This involves
knowing how to customize programs to fit the client’s situation,
and how to close a deal and deliver on the contract. It also presumes
the courage to say no to a deal if facilitation is not an appropriate
solution or will not work.. It means preparing every aspect of the
program ahead of time. Especially important is getting crystal clear
on the specific intents for the event—both rational and experiential—and
designing the components of the event that will realize those intents.
Along with these, is the setting of realistic time allotments for each
part of the program, developing the key questions the group will wrestle
with, thoroughly researching the client’s situation and needs,
and taking special care in the strategic selection of the event space.
The
Facilitator Uses Time and Space Intentionally
It is not enough
to merely select a good space for the group event. The facilitator
has to know how to create the event environment. If the janitor has
not cleaned the space up, the facilitator has to do it, and, at break
times, keep on doing it to ensure the environment remains the ally
of the event. It is important to know how to best arrange the space
so that it works for both the process and the group.
This means checking
out the space ahead of time and making sure there is a large wall to
hold the data; it means arranging the tables and chairs to communicate
intentionality and maximize face to face participation; it also means
a skilful use of decor tuned to the nature of the event and communicating
its significance.
Similarly for time:
the facilitator has be the metronome for the group, sensing the rhythm
that is most enlivening at the particular time of day; pacing the activities
so as to capitalize on the "beat" of the group; apportioning
the time available so as to get the job done and reach timely closure.
The facilitator has to also know how to punctuate the time to release
tension whether through the use of humour, or through ‘stretch
breaks’, or even great music—whatever it takes to keep
releasing the group. Finally, the facilitator knows the importance
of letting the whole group own the time and the task so that they can
make the decisions.
The
Facilitator Is Skilful in Evoking Participation and Creativity
More than a "methodologian",
the facilitator also has to be an evocateur; has to have an unshakable
belief that the group itself has the wisdom and creativity needed to
deal with the situation. What is involved here is the ability to create
a climate of participation. The facilitator has to know how to elicit
the latent wisdom in the group by catalysing everyone’s participation,
and involving the whole group in taking responsibility for its own
decisions. The ability to create a group climate conducive to both
participation and creativity has to be a critical art up every facilitator’s
sleeve.
Eliciting the wisdom
of the group is the name of the game. It is here that the facilitator’s
magic is most needed. Objective skills here involve the setting of
an enabling context that corrals and focuses the group’s insights
toward a specific topic and a focus question. Then the facilitator
has to be able to elicit the group’s best responses to the question
which involves appealing to imagination, and encouraging some boldness
and even wildness in the responses. This involves giving individuals
time to write down their own answers, so that people who think a little
more slowly, but possibly more surely, than others, have time to marshal
their input. Then the facilitator has to be able to get all the group’s
data out through an inclusive brainstorm. Here maximizing participation
is of the essence. The leader has to involve the whole group, find
ways to draw out the quieter folk, and push each one in the group to
play an active role in the organizing the data into bitable chunks,
and naming it.
The
Facilitator Is Practiced in Honouring the Group and Affirming Its Wisdom
Appropriating the
diversity of a group as a gift is more than a skill, and much more
than what is involved in the facile "I’m-OK-you’re-OK" It
stems not only from methodological necessity but from a deep recognition
of the wonder of life and the implicit wisdom and greatness of each
human being. This involves a foundational stance of affirmation, the
constant decision to reference situations positively, and the habit
of responding with the
‘yes’ before the ‘no’. The facilitator is aware
that the method works best when he is able to affirm the wisdom of each
person, honour the collective data of the whole group, celebrate the
completed work of the group, and at the same time affirm each person
in the group individually.
This is not an abstraction.
In practice it entails the ability and readiness to listen to participants’
actual words, to accept silence with understanding, to maintain accepting
eye contact with the speaker and to note down the individual’s
insights verbatim. It also entails the willingness to focus on what the
individual is saying rather than what the facilitator is going to say
next. The other side of honouring what the participant is saying is the
readiness to push occasional answers for clarity, so that the participant’s
real insight is revealed.
The
Facilitator Is Capable of Maintaining Objectivity
A key role of the
facilitator is to provide objectivity to the group process One side
of the facilitator is more like an orchestra conductor who wants a
first-class product, but the other side is more like the dispassionate
referee who knows the importance of maintaining a neutral stance toward
what is coming out of the group. To this end, the facilitator has to
be able to set aside personal opinions on the data of the group, to
be careful not to react negatively to people’s insights, and
to maintain detachment from the group-generated data. In the same universe
is the capacity to buffer criticism, anger and frustration with a non-defensive
stance when the group energy overheats.
The
Facilitator Is Skilled in Reading the Underlying Dynamics in the Group
The facilitator is
practiced in sensing dynamics in the group. ( In particular, the facilitator
has to be versed in interpreting the silence of the group, identifying
‘axes’ and hidden agenda, and not only sensing the group’s
uncertainty at particular points but taking steps to clarify it.
Deft at picking up
non-verbal cues, the facilitator can also listen to the group with ‘the
third ear’ to pick up the significance of what lies behind participants’
words. On the more active side, the facilitator is facile in pushing
negatively phrased data for its underlying insight and to probe vague
answers for their fuller meaning.
The
Facilitator Is Deft at Orchestrating the Event Drama
Paramount to engaging
the group’s commitment to the process is the development of audience
rapport. The facilitator has to be able to engage this rapport from
the start, creating icebreakers that loosen a group up. Then, as a
group goes through its alternating ups and downs of mood, the facilitator
has to be inventive in shifting time and mood intentionally to get
the job done, savvy in using personal illustrations to release the
group, and sagacious in using humour catalytically.
Along with these
talents, go the sensitivity to know when the group needs a break, when
the pace needs to be changed, when the process has reached a critical
point that needs significating., and when to allow the group to struggle
if necessary in order to reach the breakthrough point.
The
Facilitator Can Creatively Release Blocks to the Process
At the same time,
facilitator must have creative ways to release blocks to the process.
This demands a light touch to gently discourage side conversations.
It calls for shrewd tactics to discourage speechifying and argumentation,
and demands tactful ways to discourage the dominance of particular
individuals, to handle ‘difficult’ people and to deal helpfully
with conflict. If need be, the facilitator is quite capable of apologizing
publicly if the needs of the group demand it, and do anything necessary
to keep the process moving forward. In thorny situations, the facilitator
is able to bring difficult decisions back to the group so that it can
take responsibility for its own process.
The
Facilitator Is Adroit in Adapting to the Changing Situation
Facilitation involves
a balancing act on the highwire. Ancillary to all the skills so far
described is the capacity of the facilitator to flex with the changing
situation. The facilitator has to know how to balance the process on
the one hand and the results of the process on the other; and to harmonize
the needs of the participants at any one moment with the total demands
of the task.
This is based on
the foundational understanding that the process for arriving at the
results is just as important as the results themselves. In addition,
a certain mental nimbleness is mandatory: when the unexpected happens,
the ability to think and make decisions on the fly, to use the methods
flexibly, and, very occasionally, to fly by the site of one’s
pants can make the difference between success and failure.
The
Facilitator Assumes Responsibility for the Group Journey
Facilitating a process
for an organization is much, much more than using a bag of tricks to
occupy the audience for a day or two. The facilitator must have the
maturity to assume responsibility not only for the process, but also
for the overall task, the participants and the outcome of the event.
This assumes the willingness to take on a big load, to take responsibility
for every single aspect of the program, to deal successfully with ambiguity,
use one’s critical intelligence to make hard decisions and then
to take the consequences of those decisions. This assumes a solid personal
discipline and a strong spiritual base.
The
Facilitator Can Produce Powerful Documentation
Coming up with a
finessed group product—a documentary record of the group’s
insights—is the bottom line of facilitation. With the help of
an assigned documenter who inputs the group data in tandem with the
process, the participants can be handed a hard-copy product before
they leave. Vital to this is the ability to keep track of all the group-generated
data and enough versatility in using computer programs to produce the
data holding charts. Making a powerful verbal report to the client
that captures the significance and implications of the program, and,
in certain situations, and having the courage to protect the group’s
conclusions, (especially the more controversial decisions) are not
insignificant attributes of the facilitator.
The
Facilitator Demonstrates Professionalism, Self-Confidence and Authenticity
The development of
a professional self-image, self-confidence, and an intentional style
and dress is an important asset of the facilitator. Even more important
is the willingness to play the role of a model of authenticity for
the group. The facilitator can also take on whatever role the group
requires to provide a walking image of authentic selfhood in the midst
of practical tasks.
Whether working alone,
or co-facilitating with a diverse facilitation team, the facilitator
can be serious, probing the depths of unknown puzzles, or can be glad-handed,
setting at ease those reluctant to participate; or distant, causing
the group to reflect on its own insights, or close, sharing learning
in ways that illuminate the present situation of participants. With
nothing to win or lose, and able to transcend personal neuroses, the
facilitator is totally free to do what’s required by the situation
to disclose authentic human potential. Above all the facilitation practitioner
takes care to walk the facilitator’s talk. While rejoicing in
the successes of the group and giving the appearance of having a great
time, the facilitator speaks only from experience, preferring to remain
silent rather than give "good advice’ that is not grounded
in personal experience.
The
Facilitator Maintains Personal Integrity
Finally, the facilitator
knows the secret of maintaining personal integrity; has learned how
to authentically process and relate to rejection, hostility and suspicion;
how to let go of any personal pain arising from a program; and how
to take care of personal renewal for the sake of the next client situation.